

I agree with you that he isn’t all he’s cracked up to be, but the post was meant to state facts given, and I don’t see how it effects or relates to what I said.
edit: to reiterate I don’t disagree with your comment, it’s just me pointing out if he’s a fraudster or not does nothing to the original claim, and adds a bias take to the comment where I’m attempting to remain impartial.






In some cases DD will refuse to cancel it, or makes it so complicated that the customer has to go through their bank instead for it. So it could be cases where the customer attempted it and was told to screw off, so therefore they just went through their bank for a chargeback instead.
DD would still attempt delivery on those orders, and then likely try to protest the chargeback as well saying the service was “eventually” rendered as food quality is on the food place and DD is just the transport.