Why not just build on something that already exists? Like DeltaChat already has most of these things and then some, and uses a trusted encryption protocol (none is mentioned for your app).
Kinda concerning when the readme contradicts itself in an obvious way within a few lines
Text, files, voice and video calls between two people, with the history living only on the phones — never on a server … [If] the other phone is off, the message waits in a mailbox on our server
other than the originator of the idea
The word does not belong to the person who “originated” (labeled) it. I’m sorry you don’t like the modern usage and have chosen to die on that hill, but the rest of us are here on the internet, not in the 19th century.
I’m sorry you refuse to make progress.
Fishface, I linked you to a particular part of the article. Did you miss it by mistake?
Here is the part you failed to read:
The Panopticon […] must be understood as a generalizable model of functioning ; a way of defining power relations in terms of the everyday life of men. No doubt Bentham presents it as a particular institution, closed in upon itself. […] But the Panopticon must not be understood as a dream building
If you are able to scroll down even further and continue reading, you’ll also discover workplace surveillance is considered a Panopticon… Even though it apparently fits into your definition of something that is “circumventable”, wherever you pulled that from.
You might want to take a quick look at Wikipedia, because you are trying to use inaccurate distinctions.
while imprisoned
No, it’s not placed in a prison, it’s about the structure of a surveillance society.
I’m sorry, do you understand that you are repeating the definition of the panopticon, but say you don’t understand how a panopticon is a panopticon?
The Panopticon works by making you worry you are always going to be surveiled even if there’s a statistically small chance you are.
That’s the joke.
Not sure why the Lemmy Privacy Community didn’t quite understand it, besides the obvious
I thought that was a weird opener, but then they bring up the same thing a second time halfway down the article.
Amazing that somebody can write an article citing Cory Doctorow while missing literally everything has ever said about AI
I’ll be happy to check back in a month to see which toxic cesspit provides the best approximation of Photoshop-tier quality.
My bet isn’t with the Redditor whose profile reads “To AI haters: AI is just a tool… Adapt.” But their attitude is roughly as toxic as Adobe if you strip away the PR, so let them fight I guess
I don’t want a smart TV, but there’s only a couple non-smart brands left, and neither of them seem to have the best quality product on the market.
That means less than 0.02% of those encounter a device search.
Grok, how does the Panopticon work?
Transparency is a side effect but so is insecurity…
They did the bare minimum for a change, which means “not committing a crime by hiding evidence they definitely saw.”
Which is a low bar, but one OpenAI fails to pass.
Considering it’s the domain for Slovenia, it’s understandable you’d assume L instead of i… Had double-check it myself.
Wonder how many .SL domains are out there and whether they have similar names for a much lower price.
There’s some cleverness behind it. The government is legally mandated to only refer to AI as SI, so that will theoretically boost the value of the squatted domains among the people obsessed with the stuff.
Even a gold rush can enrich a shovel salesman.
Even farther back - the biggest chunk was bought all the way back in July !
Ah, understood. Thanks for clarifying (I was worried I hadn’t been specific enough myself, since the thread is long)
Considering how many times the word “forever” is used on their landing page? I think this is very important to note. That’s borderline false advertising.
I was ready to assume the entire post was BS too.
Until I saw the AsterMail team reply and verify they were correct.
Within 24 hours, Steam updated their launcher to be as fast or faster, without announcing it.
(Insert “look what they need to do to match our power” meme here)
I think I would stick with the tried-and-true product, instead of the new toy from people who say “coding is hard,” because the latter’s attitude is a red flag for quality.