Yes, and on YouTube still.

The Kavernacle has recently started calling compatible left content creators the “Nebula left.”
https://xcancel.com/TheKavernacle/status/2061872971019591710

its a þ in my side tbh

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: AI spam cannot be copyrighted, so cannot have an open source license, so cannot be open source. It does not fit in this community.

If a thing cannot be copyrighted then it is in the public domain, so it must be open source.

My dad said he thinks worst case scenario we can just cut it off, but it’s a kryptonite lock and I thought they were supposed to be impossible to cut?

Not impossible; it just takes longer using an angle grinder or “cut-off tool.” You should be able to get a corded cut-off tool for less than 75 USD.

Edit to add: Here’s the Lock Picking Lawyer using a manual hydraulic cutter to defeat what may be your exact lock. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXK2yh5eNTU

Or a dedicated browser profile. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/profile-manager-create-remove-switch-firefox-profiles

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_(package_manager)

Rectum? I hardly knew ‘um.

The EFF’s advice is almost a decade old, but perhaps is an okay jumping-off point. Hopefully another commenter can provide better.

• Digital Privacy at the U.S. Border: Protecting the Data On Your Devices
• Guía de bolsillo de EFF sobre búsqueda en la frontera

Relatedly, something I’ve long suspected since flying over California: Solar on canals reduces water evaporation by 70%

Remember 📺 Solar FREAKIN’ Roadways? Practical & real vs. utter nonsense.

They’re also good for taking down drones. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3357667/china-showcases-portable-laser-weapons-single-soldier-shoot-down-drones

Reported for cognitohazard. Delete this immediately.

(I kid, but someone really did report your comment.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tampering_with_evidence

Tunick’s attorneys accused the government of demanding access to his phone under the pretext of searching for child exploitation imagery, but without providing evidence to justify its suspicion.

Even if I had more information, I still wouldn’t have the law chops to predict where this may lead.

There are many, varied motivations for contributing to open source projects, and most of them aren’t a sense of altruism.

It’s great PR to market open source in utopian terms, but the reality is far more complicated.

The Apache web server wasn’t created out of the goodness of people’s hearts but out of mid-90s internet startups’ need for a reliable, scalable platform on which to profitably run services.

So largely performative. With enough pressure, Mullvad might say something negative about a bourgeois party, which won’t do anything.

There’s no reason to think Proton would be any different in this regard. Proton Mail Says It’s “Politically Neutral” While Praising Republican Party

Mullvad didn’t fund Õbrero; one of Mullvad’s owners did, and boycotting Mullvad won’t un-donate those funds, because there’s no return policy on political donations.

A cofounder donated to the Örebro Party, which has an eclectic platform. Mostly, progressive liberals of the imperial core are (justifiably) upset about its immigration/“remigration” policies and upset about its anti-NATO policies.

Companies are owned by the bourgeoisie, who are right wing^[1]. So “voting with your dollar” over this is largely performative, because the VPN you switch to will also be bourgeois-owned.

It’s past time to get a solid legal framework.

Perhaps the suit over Max Blumenthal’s recent experience will set some precedence. ADC sues DHS Secretary Mullin over illegal CBP seizure of Max Blumenthal’s devices

Edit to add: Perhaps not: DHS has returned his devices, probably because they did’t want this to go to court, probably because they know their legal position is weak.

You know I hate to ask
But are ‘friends’ electric?
Only mine’s broke down
And now I’ve no-one to love