It’s more than 5 eyes countries, it’s all of europe too. France already did one, the rest are trying to follow suit. Look at the chatcontrol bullshit, that trojan horse was rejected by the populations for the umpteenth time so they redesigned it as a trojan sheep of age controls and bringing it behind the walls of liberal democracy.
Vance won’t remain in charge even if he inherits it. He’s an unlikeable douchebag that can’t play a crowd, that’s why he was chosen by the paranoid president, because he wouldn’t be used to supplant him so easy.
A group of tech lords, in alliance with national security types, along with reactionary protect the kids tools.
The same people that were pushing chatcontrol. I asked the same thing and someone linked a long article from Balkan Insights that went into it, I can’t find the article myself. I would like to reread it as well.
Also, Ashton Kutchner, the actor, is spearheading a lot of this with some front group of protecting kids, bankrolled by tech. For your pleasure is a short clip about Ashton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNlY9ZqwmBI
Europe has been working this protecting children from predators angle for at least two decades, to weaken any sort of encryption or anonymity and allow more state surveillance.
This isn’t something new, it’s just that now they think they can get away with doing their worst, knowing just how fucked our voters are in the head as their political parties are all captured by oligarchs.
GTfO.
You guys and us both in the US. I know it. We can win, if we organize. We are set against each other, but that is only because we don’t have a populist leader.
Those are presumptions, correct ones. Get your head out of the asses of the suits on tv telling you how things are, it’s not that way, it’s the other way. You might already know that and are playing us on here though. Either way, you are the problem, trusting the wrong people, or worse.
On the day of the handover lock it up with ransomware.
There are reasons the government wants to force everyone to link their id and likeness to their ip address and accounts online, and it’s not the kids.
How fucking dense are we taking the government at their word while they bring the trojan horse inside the walls of liberal democracy. In the UK at that, a country that has in fact fallen farther than the US in many respects. But it’s cool because it’s “our” guy doing it! Cancelling the right to protest, jury trials, surrendering citizens to tech and instituting a dystopian hellscape where peter thiel and his ilk craft secret social scores that will determine everything about your life, what jobs you will get, loans, prices charged, police and court treatment.
Fucking sheep.
Plutocracies with total informational control of it’s citizens produces far more harm than kids having freedom online as per their parent’s direction.
But no, surrender to the government to protect the kids, I’m sure the plutocracy will keep them as safe as they plan on keeping your investments.
Next 20 years? Next year pal. Not just the police either. Just because they don’t tell you about it doesn’t mean it won’t happen sooner. You could organize to try and stop it, just a thought.
It’s not just advertisers by a long shot, they aren’t even the main customers in most respects now. Governments want all of that information and buy it, as do other commercial interests, including security consultants and contractors like Palantir.
Governments can use go betweens to buy the information too, China for instance, is likely getting every single piece of information sold by data brokers. The entire thing is a joke, on us, because it’s not about the kids, it’s about locking down the internet and crafting social scores based on everything we have said or done online and off run through half baked ai threat detection.
Starmer is a fascist cunt that will hand the government to openly fascist cunts, but yay, go team! /s
A kid circumventing internet controls should not lead to charges against the parent. What a shit take.
If you want to address the scientific points I made, I will respond. Your poetry is neither here nor there, pal.
Have you read anything about this before espousing your grand pronouncements here?
Seriously, like, you are so far in left field here, I can’t even respond.
Around 120 is maximum yes. I think some french woman might have gotten near 130 but I forget.
Unless you believe the bible, in which case hundreds and hundreds of years. And woman was made from man’s rib. Makes sense.
Says the guy that just let the trojan horse of age controls behind the walls of their liberal democracy. Get off your high horse mate, it’s time for your colonoscopy to prove you can use the internet so they can craft your social score off of all your information on half baked palantir ai models. Oi oi oi!
No worries about that, there is no changing the maximum age seemingly, not unless you genetically engineered babies with tech we don’t have yet.
Everyone is born with stem cells that carry so many copies of cells that are preprogrammed to die after a point to then be replaced by those stem cells. No drug can make more copies after the fact.
Then of course the dna gets denatured just by radiation and pollution and time.
Neither of these will or can be solved after someone is born. They can extend the average lifespan of a group, but they can’t exceed the maximum, which has remained constant throughout human history even as the average has changed drastically.
Only the rich will benefit.
Yeah but prez would have had a lot of powerful people pushing their tools onto him for vp, he chose vance because both thiel, but also because vance was an unlikeable bitch. He wouldn’t have been chosen if not for both reasons.
Vance will lose in a primary.