You are the one basing your argument on an article from 2008 , not me. You are completely deranged. Now come back with some hard evidence or go shout at the hollow moon in your tinfoil hat.
Your anecdotes are as good as a horoscope. Get real.
You are the one basing your argument on an article from 2008 , not me.
… what? You literally linked the article from Android Authority, not me.
You are completely deranged.
Says the person claiming a model’s computational power usage scales with the number of classes trained.
Now come back with some hard evidence
Hard evidence for what? I’ve never once claimed phones are listening to people’s conversations. This whole thread has been about the technical viability of such a system. Not evidence of it’s literal existence.
You, on the other hand, have spewed nonsense this whole time.
So like I’ve said more than once, come back with something real or stay in your lane.
You are the one basing your argument on an article from 2008 , not me. You are completely deranged. Now come back with some hard evidence or go shout at the hollow moon in your tinfoil hat.
Your anecdotes are as good as a horoscope. Get real.
… what? You literally linked the article from Android Authority, not me.
Says the person claiming a model’s computational power usage scales with the number of classes trained.
Hard evidence for what? I’ve never once claimed phones are listening to people’s conversations. This whole thread has been about the technical viability of such a system. Not evidence of it’s literal existence.
You, on the other hand, have spewed nonsense this whole time.
So like I’ve said more than once, come back with something real or stay in your lane.