cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoMicrotransactions for devslemmy.mlimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1480arrow-down16cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1474arrow-down1imageMicrotransactions for devslemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square37linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareScrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoI mean, it’s not like it ships it to production. You can read code it writes and modify it if you don’t like it, or choose not to use it.
minus-squarenintendiator@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down2·1 year agoIf you can read the code it writes and modify it, a project manager can remove that time from you and take the AI slop direct to production.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAnother good reason to never let the company’s project become your project.
minus-squareScrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat’s a different problem. The original question was when would a competent dev use an LLM.
minus-squarenintendiator@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWhich the answer is: never. If they did, by definition they would not be competent (unless they are being specifically trained in how to avoid code slop).
I mean, it’s not like it ships it to production. You can read code it writes and modify it if you don’t like it, or choose not to use it.
If you can read the code it writes and modify it, a project manager can remove that time from you and take the AI slop direct to production.
Another good reason to never let the company’s project become your project.
That’s a different problem. The original question was when would a competent dev use an LLM.
Which the answer is: never. If they did, by definition they would not be competent (unless they are being specifically trained in how to avoid code slop).