• mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I mean if they’re utilities, we shouldn’t let a board decide what should rightfully be in the hands of the voting public. Really they should welcome a stable (OK maybe not so stable in the US atm, but generally…) owner as the government.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Just because something is a “utility” it doesn’t mean that the government should own and run it lol.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        By your logic spaceX should stop taking gov $ then.

        Just because something is private doesn’t mean they should get public funding.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          It’s not up to SpaceX to stop taking government handouts - it’s up to the government to stop giving handouts.

          I agree with you - they shouldn’t get public funding. IMO anything the government funds they should own instead, but this doesn’t mean they should take ownership of the things that they fund - they should instead use that funding to start their own taxpayer owned competitor.

          I’m completely against government handouts for private business and NGOs btw.