…without informed consent.

  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I would rather someone posted saying they knew shit all about the sport but they were interested, than someone feigning knowledge by using ChatGPT as some sort of novel point of view, which it never is. It’s ways the most milquetoast response possible, ironically adding less to the conversation than the question it’s responding to.

    That’s literally the point of them. They’re supposed to generate what the most likely result would be. They aren’t supposed to be creative or anything like that. They’re supposed to be generic.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s still not creative. It’s just rehashing things it heard before. It’s like if a comedian just stole the jokes from other comedians but changed the names of people. That’s not creative, even if it’s slightly different than what anyone’s seen before.