• Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    This is just overly broad. If I use a LLM to aid me in debugging doesn’t mean the game is tainted.

    I guess the issue is the wording of the statement and not the tag itself.

    The line between using Gen AI as a tool and and putting unfiltered output out there is very blurry.

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Still, it gives consumers the choice. If you choose not to consume diamonds due to the whole diamond thing, that’s fine even though synthetics exist.

      • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Then, isn’t it best to say what you used the AI on, so that consumers can make even better choices?

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        It’s like giving people the choice to not eat carbon because some forms, like natural diamonds, are exploitative. People cheer because nobody wants to eat pencil dust since it tastes so bad.

        It sounds like a great idea as long as you don’t understand how anything works.

        (For the people that don’t understand how anything works: Carbon is an integral component of literally everything that you will ever eat)