Galactose@sopuli.xyz to Opensource@programming.dev · edit-24 days agoLet's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Optionblog.edwardloveall.comexternal-linkmessage-square9linkfedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down16file-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
arrow-up167arrow-down1external-linkLet's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Optionblog.edwardloveall.comGalactose@sopuli.xyz to Opensource@programming.dev · edit-24 days agomessage-square9linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
I was curious about your opinions (Not my article). Also this mentions Fossil & Pijul. Which are fully-fledged Git-Alternatives (Not just github)
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 days agoPartially true, yes, that is a downside: codeberg currently does not allow non-free licenses. But no, a repository does not have to be public.
Partially true, yes, that is a downside: codeberg currently does not allow non-free licenses. But no, a repository does not have to be public.