JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agodotnet developerprogramming.devexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkdotnet developerprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square2fedilink
minus-squareOneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoSorry, what’s .Net again? The runtime? You mean .Net, or .Net Core, or .Net Framework? Oh, you mean a web framework in .Net. Was that Asp.Net or AspNetcore? Remind me why we let the “Can’t call it Windows 9” company design our enterprise language?
minus-squareTrailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago Can’t call it Windows 9 But that actually made sense! They care about backwards compatibility. For those not in the know: some legacy software checked if the OS name began with “Windows 9” to differentiate between 95 and future versions.
Sorry, what’s .Net again?
The runtime? You mean .Net, or .Net Core, or .Net Framework? Oh, you mean a web framework in .Net. Was that Asp.Net or AspNetcore?
Remind me why we let the “Can’t call it Windows 9” company design our enterprise language?
But that actually made sense! They care about backwards compatibility.
For those not in the know: some legacy software checked if the OS name began with “Windows 9” to differentiate between 95 and future versions.