• nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    You’re defending slop, reacting like the slime in Ghostbusters.

    I’d usually call you a slopvangelical LLM thumper, but I’m trying to branch out.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No, I’m defending a useful tool. I don’t use it to make “slop”, I use it to help improve aspects of my life. Fuck me, right? How fucking dare I do that UNLESS it’s by a method you approve?

      You’re the ignorant one that thinks the only use is to make AI art or whatever.

      • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Dig up, mate.

        None of this AI grift is meant to be treated as serious.

        The very foundation it’s built upon is energised sand performing explicitly and purposefully inaccurate and imprecise calculations in an explosively cascading sequence.

        How better to describe the result of this than as slop?

        Much like any other religious adherence, I don’t care what you believe and subject yourself to personally, but my threshold for calling out and ridiculing is the same. When those beliefs and impositions are forced on non-believers without consent, which is what’s happening from this hype cycle.