Hi there, I’m looking to get into self-hosting for privacy reasons and I wanted to ask y’all: how inadvisable is it to utilize an ISP-owned router/modem? I feel like they’re able to track everything I do online with their more than likely integrated spyware.

  • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    ISP can see your traffic anyways regardless if their router is at your end or not. In here any kind of ‘user behavior monitoring’ or whatever they call it is illegal, but the routers ISPs generally give out are as cheap as you can get so they are generally not too reliable and they tend to have pretty limited features.

    Also, depending on ISP, they might roll out updates on your device which may or may not reset the configuration. That’s usually (at least around here) made with ISPs account on the router and if you disable/remove that their automation can’t access your router anymore.

    So, as a rule of thumb, your own router is likely better for any kind of self hosting or other tinkering, but there’s exceptions too.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The ISP wouldn’t see your self hosted traffic. Not to mention many people don’t encrypt it if it’s on their own local network. And ISP tracking is becoming less successful with QUIC, Encrypted Client Hello, and DNS over HTTPS or DNS over TLS.

      • irmadlad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve often wondered about down votes as well. It’s not the points, as I care nothing about that. However, if you’re going to down vote something, have the balls to explain why. Maybe the down voter knows something that we all can learn from. It just seems like a common courtesy to do so.

          • irmadlad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Could be. Not ruling that out. It seems to pile up tho on certain comments tho. Makes me wonder. I’m always down to be schooled. Shit son, ring the bell! Ahhh the internet.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          However, if you’re going to down vote something, have the balls to explain why.

          This is why downvoting is fundamentally flawed. It could be “I don’t like it” all the way up to “I know for a fact that’s wrong,” but nobody else will ever know the rationale.

          I don’t even see downvotes on my instance, and I never want to, because it just raises questions and confusion.

          • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I’ve always liked the way slashdot handles comment rating. It’s a bit complicated, so maybe that’s why it’s not adopted elsewhere, but it gives a much more fine grained options instead of just up/downvote.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Oh, that’s an interesting way to do it. You’d probably have to have a handful of moderators each for the various comms, but it sounds like it would at least resist lazy engagement.

          • irmadlad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            because it just raises questions and confusion.

            This. I think, waay back in the day, down voting was a way to filter bad information. Whenever I see a down vote on something I’ve said, I’m always left wondering if I gave erroneous information, was I out in the weeds smokin’ crack? I’m always down for being educated.