What’s at stake is whether “protecting children” becomes a legal pretext for embedding government control over the internet to enforce specific moral and religious judgments—judgments that deny marginalized people access to speech, community, history, and truth—into law.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/40170883

What’s at stake is whether “protecting children” becomes a legal pretext for embedding government control over the internet to enforce specific moral and religious judgments—judgments that deny marginalized people access to speech, community, history, and truth—into law.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      21·
      11 days ago

      Sure thing pal.

      It’s a real shame Bell Labs started this slippery slope with gecos half a century ago. Slippery indeed.

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
      1·
      11 days ago

      Well he gave me an actual answer while you shit the bed. Being a dick for no reason is a fast way to make sure no one takes you seriously.