• flactwin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    so more restrictions, cool, interesting but how much they have to do to totaly inject hate in their userbase like facebook did

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s not a restriction, it’s user control. You can have them always on (and I suspect that will stay as the default), turn them off, or anything in between.

      You just got more tools to control the interface and remove what you don’t care about, what’s wrong about that?

      • flactwin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        appreciate it but just not write full reply, i thought: yes this feature is great but they have more restrictions and always fight adblockers, yes this still understandable by this is biggest video sharing service

      • baines@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        lol there is no 0 option

        this isn’t about user control this is getting ahead of CYA because regulation is likely coming given multiple countries are serious about limiting ages that can access social media

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You mean, no such option in an app? Because at least the article and the post clearly state you can opt for 0.

          • baines@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            and pc web interface and tv interface has no option at all and the app for ios has no 0 option

            article is pretty shit if it didn’t test any of these