The coordinated effort worked. When lawmakers finalized Colorado SB26-051, they added Section 6-30-105(e) to the text. This specific clause waives compliance for operating systems and applications distributed under licenses that allow copying, modifying, and redistributing without platform-imposed technical restrictions. Why the Section 6-30-105(e) Exemption Protects Decentralized Tech

This exemption establishes a formal legislative precedent for the tech industry. It legally shields free and open-source operating systems from hardware-level age attestation laws that closed ecosystems like iOS and Windows will soon have to follow.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’m not in a GPDR jurisdiction, but if memory serves, is there not some clause preventing service providers for compelling me to “willingly” provide information to access the service, similar to a “duress” situation?

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        There is something like that but I’m not sure it really has the force we all wanted it to. I don’t know if it’s been tested in court yet, but the optimistic people thought it would ban any kind of “be tracked or else you have to pay”, but I believe a lot of services are operating exactly this way.