• SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not to mention the power requirements would likely require more than solar unless they put solar panels up far bigger than anything put up there before.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Beyond the power requirements for the computer, there is also the power that will be needed to transmit back to earth.

      A wireless link that can pass the amount of bandwidth needed (and do it reliably) will need huge power as well.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If we did make something like that, could you even put it on a disposable dish meant to burn up in the atmosphere after 5ish years? There’s already uncertainty about all the dishes burning up and long term impacts, but a mini nuclear reactor?

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            No. At least historically they went the opposite way: the nuclear materials be contained well enough to survive reentry and impact