You shouldn’t be posting that without the context in that comment:

FYI, the article was presumably taken down because many of the quotes turned out to have been fabricated, and they said they were investigating this. (I don’t think that they are trying to cover up anything, just that they have not gotten around to written an official response yet, given that this is a recent development.)

Ugh, that is utterly disappointing to see from Ars Technica. Here’s a bit of context about it: https://mastodon.social/@nikclayton/116065459933532659

Fortunately, the article was already archived, for what it’s worth: https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

@quacksalber@sh.itjust.works

I am an active editor lol. I’m saying that the proposal is to establish something similar to TWL for media URLs. It would serve the same purpose for editors as a major complaint in the discussion was over addition of Archive.today links to bypass paywalls. Obviously developing this deal would take a lot of work but it is workable.

You must first apply to gain access.

That’s not true. Anyone who meets the stats you mentioned may access TWL.

the WML does not host any of these publications

Indeed, that’s what makes it legally sound and prevents us from needing to relicense. We don’t need to license the content to copyleft for the thing to work.

The Wikimedia project gets to host verbatim third-party news articles? This is creative but completely unrealistic

It would be just like the extant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library.

In the worst case we could just run Megalodon on all the archive.today URLs

No, you do not need real time chat, you need searchable, permanent presence

why not both? Discourse is really nice but it’s a forum, not IRC or Matrix

I disagree, but we’ll see what they do with it

https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500005292701-How-to-Access-an-Age-Restricted-Server-FAQ clarifies that Discord would only do that for servers that otherwise violate the Community Guidelines’s provisions on adult content, whose only mention of which I quoted above.

Server owners must apply an age-restricted label to any channels that contain sexually explicit content involving adults or content involving adults that is shared solely for the purposes of sexual gratification.

nothing else needs to be age-restricted, and age restriction of topics you mentioned would be big news for discord. pluralkit’s home is discord and has great influence there, and the lgbtq+ community definitely has a larger presence than the plural community

only changes for the unverified:

• Channels, servers, and commands set to age-restricted will be inaccessible
• DM requests deemed “sensitive” will be inaccessible
• “Sensitive content” will be blurred
• Won’t be able to become a speaker in “stage” channels, a special type where a few videoconferencers have a meeting where anyone else can watch and type but not videoconference; verified watchers can be invited to speak
• DMs from unfamiliar users will be routed to a separate “warning”

nothing else

I think this is business as usual…

Kernel anticheat probably does.

Their back end now has to have the compute power to encode and serve up gigabits of streaming video for anything more than ~50 concurrent users

it’s actually the customers’ bandwidth, not theirs. everything is self-hosted by the customer.

not sure if that’s worse

it seems like they sometimes need to stream the finished app coded, too

(still no need for 60 fps…)

useless

People are paying them for it, so it’s useful enough apparently.

how does it service the corporation? everyone that knows about the company should know about this abbreviation

Lisp is (elegantly IMO but also in a way that makes it intimidating to read) indeed built on lists. I do not see how that makes Python’s lists have any relation to Lisp.

I don’t think Lisp invented lists

because it’s k if cond else j, not if cond k j

i have never heard someone say “not wrong” other than a context like “not even wrong”