FaceDeer

Yeah, I’d much rather have random humans I don’t know anything about making those “moral” decisions.

If you’re already answered, “No,” you may skip to the end.

So the purpose of this article is to convince people of a particular answer, not to actually evaluate the arguments pro and con.

Sounds like an auction with extra steps.

And frankly, seeing the mod abuse that goes on in many communities, having AI moderators helping with text moderation would be nice too. At least they’d be more consistent.

“For the most part” really doesn’t cut it in an industry like this.

In short, Bybit was abysmally sloppy with their security.

Alright, that’s not what the statement was about.

That’s not what the question was about.

Depends which exchange you’re using.

It’s a common misconception that a “cold wallet” is offline. It’s still on the blockchain like any other wallet, it’s just the keys that aren’t on any network-connected computer.

It appears that in this case hackers managed to trick Bybit employees into entering the keys into a fake UI that gave the hackers access to them.

EFF has always been opposed to the expansion of copyright, regardless of the “size” of the copyright holders involved.

Why would a Chinese-made AI have American censorship and propaganda in it?

AI can do subtitles too.

I’m not expecting them to do anything specifically to benefit the rest of us. But let them fight. If nothing else, it costs them money.

Thanks! DFCaverns was kind of my “baby”, and the one I keep thinking I should get back into modding to continue developing. I can’t promise anything, of course, but this is of course fun and encouraging to hear. :) Making DFCaverns Mineclone-compatible was quite a chore back in the day, glad to hear it’s still working!

Oh, neat. Yeah, that’s me. :) Been a couple of years since I’ve picked up the modding pen, but I still remember those days fondly. Just got really busy with life for a while and fell out of the habit.

You don’t think the publishing industry would like to sue Meta over this?

Well, yes, why would you believe something without seeing it? But given how litigious the publishing industry is about this kind of thing I don’t see it as likely that they wouldn’t fight.

They’ll compare the amount the publishers are demanding against how much it would cost them to lawyer up to prevent that and any future payments. Meta’s heavyweight enough that they can use “lobbying their way out of the law, aka changing the law so that they’re not violating it at all” as a strategy.

If they do simply pay the publishers off, oh well, at least it’s just the status quo. But I don’t see a reason to assume that’s the way this is going to go. Other countries have already carved explicit exceptions to copyright for AI training, Meta would be in favor of that kind of thing.

You think Meta will just roll over and hand out whatever penalties the publishers demand of them?

Meta isn’t going to be defending us. It’s going to be defending itself. Because it is now one of us.

I think this is still going to be a net benefit to us, though. Meta may not have contributed much bandwidth, which is leeching in the short term, but in the long term they’re now forced to contribute something much more important; lawyer power. Meta is going to have to fight to defend piracy.