… Meta’s security systems were unable to identify…

I think you mean incentivized to ignore

And with the exception of the first, commonplace for a long time.

I would also argue the first use is actually a process flaw if implemented. That’s a great way to make sure no one reads emails, and all kinds of information is lost

Now we’re going to have to go north for medicine and graphics cards

Fuck, I don’t want to be a keyboard pervert, but these are some good points

Soon™️

The title makes it sound like the judge put Data and the AI on the same side of the comparison. The judge was specifically saying that, unlike in the fictional Federation setting, where Data was proven to be alive, this AI is much more like the metaphorical toaster that characters like Data and Robert Picardo’s Doctor on Voyager get compared to. It is not alive, it does not create, it is just a tool that follows instructions.

The existence of intelligence, not the quality

I’d settle for reasonable ports

Data preservationists are beating back the coming dark age. They’re heroes.

It looks just like the Tik Tok ban to me. Racist/Nationalist nonsense that doesn’t solve the actual underlying problem, which is lack of regulation in the US

“the single greatest insider threat risk the Bureau of the Fiscal Service has ever faced.”

https://www.wired.com/story/treasury-bfs-doge-insider-threat/

Same energy