“Tell me you don’t know how reddit works without saying you don’t know how reddit works.”
“Tell me you don’t know how reddit works without saying you don’t know how reddit works.”
Sure, but they’re rat balls, having been included with the rat penis transplant.
Deficiency signalling.
What even counts as “performing” there?
The law applies to any website whose content is one-third or more “harmful to minors”
So … Infowars, Fox News, OAN, Answers in Genesis, JW, Texas.gov … right?
Or, all the porn sites should just put huge amounts of public domain works and open source repositories on their sites, so that less than one-third is “harmful to minors.”
It’s on par with a thought experiment. The notion is still one worth considering, even if it is impractical or unsuitable to create a literal test based on it.
Oh sure - and I didn’t mean it to be pointing a finger at you, either. I just remembered the Sweden thing and thought it was contextual.
That was meant as the “Royal You”.
They already have all the data you’ve already given them. Just stop going there.
Ha I got some message from that same account name weeks ago.
Do you really need to search for that?
With a magnifying glass.
Oh wait. Not “incinerate an ant.” I got nothing then.
“Proud black queer momma of 2 & truth-teller,”
This sounds like a caricature.
I didn’t say to use profit to calculate the fine.
There is a comparison here, between the amount of the fine and revenue. I’m saying that a more appropriate comparison would be between the fine and profit.
Not saying the fine is fine, but revenue doesn’t matter here. Profit does.
That’s because it’s just gambling.