

TIL what pithy actually means.


TIL what pithy actually means.


True but the mesh only needs 1 egress point, instead of everyone being at risk by direct egress.


You can hide an intermittent mesh networking device in anything with a solar panel, it’s not that easy to triangulate users if the communications are intermittent (although that itself doesn’t play nicely with consumer devices.


Satellite internet is not a good option, it’s easy to block and easy to spot people using it.
Maintaining links to the global Internet is easier to do if you’re hiding your transmission inside other things, but that’s easier said than done.


Do you have examples?
Because most of what you are listing is stuff that has been using ML for years (possibly decades when it comes to meteorology) and just slapped “AI” on as a buzzword.


What advances?


I guess the idea just didn’t have legs!


LLMs don’t have anything to do with abstract ideas, they quite literally produce derivative content based on their training data & prompt.


The same can be said of the approach described in the article, the “GPLv4” would be useless unless the resulting weights are considered a derivative product.
A paint manufacturer can’t claim copyright on paintings made using that paint.


Seems like the easiest fix is to consider the produce of LLMs to be derivative products of the training data.
No need for a new license, if you’re training code on GPL code the code produced by LLMs is GPL.


Hey I’m a human, but have you considered letting the Lord our Savior Tux into your boot partition?


Yeah the article is pretty trash.
15% of the top subs contain corporate propaganda becomes “15% of the subs are compromised”, “compromised” means something more than “contains propaganda” to me.


Wasn’t Digg 2.0 what “created” Reddit (or at least gave it critical mass) (along with the child porn obviously)


Lemmy has VC funding?
I actually think the lack of funding means Lemmy doesnt have the same incentives to enshitify itself.
Still quoted by facists who pretend it’s a better source than Wikipedia?