Australia’s system is IRV (for the federal government / lower house). Schulze is significantly better.
IRV has the tendency to eliminate moderate candidates in the first round (only first preferences count in the first round) which is often where Condorcet candidates lie.
IRV doesn’t enforce two parties like FPTP but it still promotes polarisation.
Debian votes using the Schulze Method, which is a Condorcet method..
Condorcet methods attempt to answer the question “who would win if we asked everyone to vote on every pair of candidates”. Most of the variations between methods deal vary only where there are cyclic preferences e.g. people vote B over A, A over C and C over B.
They’re broadly considered the fairest voting systems available and they permit a candidate that everyone thinks is okay to win over polarising candidates (unlike first past the post and IRV, but like approval voting).
Back to the numbers, the big table is the reconstruction of the pairwise votes (people actually vote by ranking candidates but the ordering is taken to show your pairwise preferences)
Below that is the Schulze process steps being carried out. At the bottom the “Schwartz set” is the set of top, cyclic candidates. There is no cycle so there is only one candidate remaining and therefore a Condorcet candidate wins (the one people in general vote over everyone else).
There’s a start stand up button?? I’ve never seen that - what does it even do?
Interesting topic, awful article. Three photos, none of which are of the subject of the article, and all of which are captioned with the article title instead of real captions?
Here’s the actual car:
I got it from this much better article from TechCrunch
And here’s the the associated project, noRecognition. It’s a run of ai adversarial clothes.
If you store your timers in absolute time and keep them sorted, you only ever need to check the first timer rather than decrementing every timer every step.
That’s disappointing to hear. Which core did you get?
It’s smaller than you’re looking for but I’d be remiss not to bring up the MNT Pocket Reform
I haven’t had the chance to watch, but according to the comments it’s Barnes Hut.
XMPP is the standard messaging protocol. I recommend Conversations for android, but of course any worthwhile protocol has multiple independent frontends.
VLC can play anything because of its reliance on the amazing ffmpeg. MPV also uses ffmpeg, as does any video tool worth it’s salt.
The video looks so much like their promoted articles that I thought for a good few moments that the article just ended after the first paragraph
The origin of the hobby 3D printer is the RepRap project, a community open hardware project. Josef Prusa was actively involved. The first printer the company actively sold - the Prusa i3 - is still on the RepRap website.
They got a bit more restrictive with their licencing terms in the recent past which is both understandable and a bit of a slap in the face to where they came from, but they’re still the most open 3D printer manufacturer.
(Not the most open 3d printer though, that award has to go to DIY only models like the Voron)
Certainly for all. I was mostly thinking in terms of e.g. languages that (can) compile to LLVM, since you have the intermediate form already defined. But then languages layer quite a lot on top of LLVM in terms of abstractions and safety constraints that make it probably a bad intermediary even for that subset. Even just for one language, there must be something funuseful that can be done just by viewing the same code with different syntaxes.
This also reminds me of the spatial computing project DynamicLand
I fundamentally disagree with the idea that “programming sucks” but there are some neat thoughts and tools in there.
This bit in particular:
We don’t even have to give up code! The GUI version of a program could merely be one of several human-editable representations. Just as some people love text-based interfaces to their operating systems, some people will continue to enjoy code-based interfaces to software editing. It just doesn’t have to be the default—or the only—option anymore.
I’ve often thought about the idea that to an extent a programming syntax does not have to be married to a language. We could potentially have editors and syntaxes designed so that each developer can interact with the code in the syntax they’re most comfortable with, independent of the language. I don’t know how realisable this is, it may be underestimating how tightly coupled syntax and language is.
I’m not a big fan of graphical programming in general, but there are times when I would like it just for a single function or class, for signal processing or control systems or state machines. I usually think of this in terms of editor plugins or external code gen tools rather than whole environments. Although every code gen tool I’ve used to date sucks.
Open Game Art has a music category
ThoughtPunks (open TTRPG group) list a handful of places for creative commons music.
If you’re making a game for sale, I highly recommend you find an artist you like (possibly through Creative Commons contributions) and reach out to that specific artist you make something meaningful for your game
It’s fine for input, but Logseq “.md” files are only suitable for import back into Logseq (at least if they have any links)
Super is for my window manager.
Which I guess is kind of where copy paste live so I’m on board, barring semantic nitpicks
Currently “older cards” is GTX 10xx series and earlier
This is a deliberate choice made by Nvidia with respect to their proprietary drivers, and has nothing to do with the operating system.
This sounds a little like the AT protocol (or my weak understanding of it). AFAICT on a protocol level your identity and personal data is decoupled from a content aggregator.