

Perhaps over video logs they send to each other periodically…


Perhaps over video logs they send to each other periodically…


As usual folks are blind to second order effects.


Literally all knowledge and understanding requires memorization of some sort and the understanding of reality and prior information.
It is difficult to fathom the level of wrong in this comment.
Here’s the thing people who lack knowledge, critical thinking and understanding about the how the world works. Still form opinions and makes decisions as if they did have that knowledge and understanding. Which negatively affects everyone else.


32/35 students here did this. That’s a hell of a lot more than just “the bad ones”


32 out of 35 students is crazy…
91% Of students not only cheating with AI. But 91% being so unaware and unengaged that they’re not even checking the work or the answers.
We are so fucked


It’s only bike shedding if the people arguing over it don’t know enough about the topic to actually make cohesive arguments.
Things like how we name things and the grammar we use are quite important in cognitive psychology. And we can take advantage of research into cognitive psychology to better improve how we write software.


The room temperature IQ cop is going to plug the phone into a system that will do that forensic detection. Using commercial or special software.
Room temperature IQ cop knows how to plug the cord into the phone and the cord into the laptop.


No, they’re throwing the book at him to make a statement.
Their argument, which is stated in the article, is that since he was not in the US (you are not considered in the U.S. until you go through border protection, even if physically here), US rights and protections don’t apply.
Similarly, this isn’t destruction of evidence they are charged for. It is destruction of property to prevent seizure. Which is a bit awkward because that’s a law in the US, but he isn’t in the US yet…?
Of course, it’s all bullshit. We all know this, but this is going to set a very dangerous precedent if it sticks.


I mean, screw performance. You can get away with a lot of shitty performance and still have a completely functional application. However, the kind of slop that happens around module boundaries that turns your codebase into a giant pile of workarounds and hacks really sucks.
And AI is particularly bad at this, as AI almost always prefers to work around a problem or do everything it can to meet the plan the user approved, even if that plan meets reality, it has problems. Which tends to lead to cascading misalignment with intentions and cascading infrastructure and architectural technical debt.
All of which culminate in less stable software, lower likelihood of long-term support of that software, and worse performance.


None of this actually proves that they aren’t writing slop. It just proves that the slop that they’ve written passes your tests.


Indirect corporate sympathizing is what this is.
Blame consumers for the abuse and malpractice of corporations who SHOULD be publicly regulated.
This viewpoint encourages their practices by peddling the same logic these corporations use to continue justifying their practices.


Name-calling like children do isn’t going to meme this better.


The summary OP posted is LLM slop as well


laser printers or toner
Laser printers use toner.
Laser printers are also more complex devices.


The environmental regulation already exists. It’s just not enforced.
Because federal agencies are captured by special interests and gutted.


Wait till you use a Mac!
Somehow they saw that and said “Hold my Beer” and went out of their way to ensure their users get maximum RSI pain.


Which is illegal according to EPA regulations, last I knew.
Yeah, here we are.


3-6 active sessions on different work trees isn’t unheard of either
They aren’t?
They are buying up capacity from manufacturers who are stopping production of DRAM and pivot to HBM which is more profitable. Abandoning DRAM which affects a lot more than just “consumer grade RAM”