

You should not trust any company with your privacy regardless of where they’re located. Proton is logging what you’re doing just as much as anyone else.


You should not trust any company with your privacy regardless of where they’re located. Proton is logging what you’re doing just as much as anyone else.


I’m not saying I agree with it, but this is the actual meaning of the word:
The term jailbait existed long before the subreddit and is used to refer to underage girls that are sexually attractive, therefore they are “baiting” you to go to jail by having sex with them.
Oh, and the posts on the subreddit were non-nude photos of underage girls the posters thought were attractive. It was very gross.


That only applies if you aren’t recording audio as well.
Reasonable expectation of privacy applies to video recording, audio recording, and still photography. You can be in a public space having a private conversation if you can reasonably expect no one would be able to hear it, but you can’t have a conversation in front of a plainly visible surveillance camera and then claim you were being eavesdropped on. You don’t even truly need to “consent” to being recorded, you just have to have knowledge that it is happening.
That’s also not what you said, your original comment was “it’s not legal to have a video camera pointed at the street”.
In my state for instance it is also illegal to be able to see license plates from personally owned security cameras
I’d love to see a law on the books anywhere that says this. License plates do not have more rights than people. By “compliance expert” did you actually mean that you’re a cop? Usually cops are the ones going around spreading legal misinformation like this.
Why do so many people on Lemmy just really need a “gotcha”?
You were so confident that you were correct that you brazenly posted something that contradicted your misinformation without reading it.


Your link completely refutes what you’re saying lol
The legality of video recording hinges on the concept of a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” You are permitted to record video of your own property and public spaces visible from your property, such as sidewalks and the street in front of your house.
Maybe try reading it next time “compliance expert”


Bitwarden caches your vault to your device, so you don’t actually need a live connection to the server.


It’s not a feature I use, but I just tested it in the latest beta release and it worked fine.


No, Traccar seemed like the better of the two, but I don’t like that you can’t use the site without webGL.


I’ve tried owntracks and traccar and I’m not really a fan of either so I’d love to try this once it’s open sourced.
It does, that’s the icon for Cromite.


It is illegal to take pictures of people in public spaces in 0 states.


I honestly think they made it look worse than the original.


There are four Beatles songs with more than 3 songwriter credits and they’re all pretty forgettable. All but Flying are either from their early pop days or from Let it Be when they stopped giving a shit right before they broke up the band:
Dig It Flying Maggie Mae Please Mr. Postman
Thanks for helping to demonstrate my point.


Uninspired design by committee garbage performed by a group assembled by record label executives. If a song has more than 3 songwriting credits it is guaranteed trash.


K-pop is just as bad as most countries’ soulless corporate pop music, including from the US.


Yeah, if something like Obtanium needs to run on my desktop instead of my phone and I have to plug it in every once in a while, that’s not the end of the world.


They’re already developing the apps for the 1% of us not just using proprietary apps from the play store. I don’t think this just kills open source app development.


It’s not completely meaningless because if it’s truly the only option I’m going to be using it until I eventually replace my current phone with one with an unlocked bootloader.


It was this, and they could have explained what it was doing in better detail, but it probably would have made those people even less likely to read it.



Those conversations were shared by the users and they checked a box saying to make it discoverable by web searches. I wouldn’t call that “leaked”, and openAI immediately removed the feature after people obviously couldn’t be trusted to use it responsibly, so that kind of seems like privacy is a concern for them.
The audits mean nothing when the Swiss government can compel Proton to do whatever they want, as they’ve done before.
The only difference between what you’re describing and what Proton did is that Proton were obligated to notify the user.