Use syncthing, there is some unofficial app on the iPad for it and the official one on Linux.
Use syncthing, there is some unofficial app on the iPad for it and the official one on Linux.
Yes exactly, but not only to the NAS but also between each other.
First you need to change the UI port on the second user, to do that you have to change it in the config XML file for that user.
Once done you can start both instances at the same time. How do you start it now? I’m starting it with systems, and there is the way to start it for each user seperatelly on boot with:
systemctl enable syncthing@myuser.service
systemctl start syncthing@myuser.service
For android there is https://github.com/Catfriend1/syncthing-android/wiki
I use syncthing like you on a Linux laptop with two users. You need to run two instances of syncthing on two different ports then there is no problem.
PostgreSQL is the more feature rich, but if you don’t care about all those features like saving and searching in json structures, Geo data structures and a to of other stuff because you have a simple APO then MySQL is good enough, maybe even SQLite.
Does that mean also no musk-mobiles in China?
He got so much more out of Twitter than we could have imagined, he lit the USA on fire with it, that’s worth much more than the couple of billion lost. I think TikTok is even more powerful than Twitter.
It’s a match made in heaven, win, win, win for every autocrat involved.
I agree with your sentiment that it’s very bad that you can’t even move communities to a new server if the admin wants it, not to talk about if they didn’t want to.
I really like how matrix implemented it, you can start a public room, other people can make aliases, if your server is gone everything is still accessible through the aliases.
I like the webring idea but I would hope finding the right server would be automated, clicking through thousands of servers sounds exhausting.
So, did a LLM write this story?
How hard are the concept of uploading to more than one platform and dogfeeding selfhosting to understand.
The thing is people always talk about there being not enough content on peertube but then nobody uploads their videos to it even if they have an instance. And on top of it, there is a easy way to synchronize your YouTube and PeerTube channel too if you insist to keep using YouTube for uploading, just add your YouTube channel URL to your PeerTube channel and tell it to synchronize, that’s it, it will do it for you. But for some reason the self hosting YouTubers can’t be bothered with that?
Most of the views would be still in YouTube anyway, and those tremendous amounts are not that big because with PeerTube you share the bandwidth with other instances and even other clients (source: I’m running my own instance).
So they do have a PeerTube instance, just chose not to upload anything to it?
They could always upload a copy to YouTube to reach the rest also.
So why are the videos not self hosted?
So that sounds all nice, why the change from the yesteryears?
I have 3 passports, how does it know which one I want to use?
It really depends for what. I don’t think nginx config should be in $HOME/.conf/
Oh, wow, at least in Black Mirror they only made sure your eyes were open, you didn’t need to pay attention.