

Resiliency dilemma. Which type of redundancy to choose.
Treat all opinions with a grind of salt.
Username similarity could be coincidental.
Resiliency dilemma. Which type of redundancy to choose.
You can easily check it by WHOIS:
$ whois dev.
% IANA WHOIS server
% for more information on IANA, visit http://www.iana.org/
% This query returned 1 object
domain: DEV
organisation: Charleston Road Registry Inc.
address: 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
address: Mountain View CA 94043
address: United States of America (the)
# the rest of output omitted
And some hints gives Wikipedia: List of Internet top-level domains.
The main issues I can see:
If somehow you can install an SSH v2 client, with 2FA login - will be somehow useful.
My fast research, a PSP with custom firmware, and PSPSSH SSH client (not sure if it supports current ciphers).
OVH no problems for years.
BUT choose domain that is also maintained by non-US organization.
Like national TLDs from the EU, or fancy like one., cloud., …
That’s the thing.
Also magnet link if you want.
So it’s a semi-rolling release then.
RIP Shrooms
Too good to be true.
Light is light (or just THz range of frequency), there are the reasons why it isn’t mainstream.
E.g. fog, heavy rain, snow, hot air “artifacts”, etc.
Ubuntu ship a lot of security updates
After introducing the Pro I don’t think so.
Business ethics? Meh, just profits, just profits.
Not yet 😅
I had a scunthorpe.
Too many hosts.
Current scheme: British towns names. They are quite unique.
I think I’m Brazilians now 🇧🇷 🫡
An alternative browser (not based on the Chromium) should be driven by the community (vide Proton).
Who owns the Red Hat and runs The CentOS Project?
The same bad guys.
Maybe zram-generator?
🖕Nvidia
Stop dehumanizing drivers who killed people.
Feature, wrongly called, Full Self-Driving, shall be supervised at any time.