• 39 Posts
  • 1.49K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2025

help-circle











  • you cannot reliably disable things in windows because Microsoft “accidentally” reactivates them all the time. Backward compatibility is impressive in terms of binary translation in prism, but really old legacy software no no no. the multiple abstraction layers fuck performance even harder and their TPM solution phones home to Microsoft every goddamn time it is used. The entire point of windows 11 was to make it cheaper for Microsoft and fire all the experienced people keeping the ship afloat. It did not work because they were letting buisness majors make engineering decisions.

    Please understand, you may have an opinion, but the rest of us actually know what we are talking about.









  • That’s was weirdly aggressive. I’m trying to understand motive and you respond with dismissal, which means you either considered the inquiry an attack or that this project is actually dumb and that is not a satisfying answer.

    Instead of chasing the dismissal and turning this into an internet slap fight among the most limp-wristed on Lemmy, let’s get back to my question: why do this?

    Does this solve a UX issue? Is there some incredible performance advantage? Does it solve a problem? Is it an interesting technical challenge where something shouldn’t be possible but a neurodivergent paused his Minecraft videos and said hold my beer unconvincingly? Why was this done? Help me tune into what makes this impressive.