Passkey doesn’t require biometrics necessarily. Password managers are adding support for them, so you can use bitwarden for example which supports password and a security device combo to login and use the passkeys. Passkeys should be more secure than passwords in a password manager since it would only allow using it in the proper domain preventing attacks like opening malicious links in emails or typos when typing a domain manually.

That said a lot of the current approaches to passkeys do use biometric / pin to unlock so you gotta find what’s right for your OPSEC values.

All that said, the article seems pretty bad.

When you die your social is reused and assigned to someone else eventually. This is what makes it not unique. If something were to screw up in the process the new person could have debt from the prior person for example even though it is not their debt. Another concept common is using the last 4. There are so many conflicts when using just last 4 in a database its bad design.

Yeah I was looking at all of their services tbh but that one looks expensive at first ignoring the deal ~$8/mo. I suppose if you are actively using 4+ TB its not too bad though.

I guess its comparable to others in ways with free api calls / egress but they charge a flat rate higher than others on storage.

He will probably leak it on discord dedicated to some treasury game to win an argument against some 12 year old.

Wow IDrive looks extremely expensive for backups, unless if there is something I am missing.