The refresh rate doesn’t have to be constant though. Each “step” however long it took to simulate would seem like an instant to us. Our conciousnesses are also simulated, which means we always percieve the new frames as fast as we are simulated.
The simulator could even break down and resume without us noticing. It also doesnt’t have to be fast enough to simulate a second per second. Imagine a simulator actually running for (more) billions of years. It seems silly but possible.
Yes, time isn’t a limiting factor, but error free, coherent processing is.
It could get so long that it becomes impossible for that much information to be processed without a certain number of errors and then the simulation would start breaking down.
The bigger it is, the more information it has and the longer it takes for the next quanta of time in-simulation, the most the risk of error increases.
The refresh rate doesn’t have to be constant though. Each “step” however long it took to simulate would seem like an instant to us. Our conciousnesses are also simulated, which means we always percieve the new frames as fast as we are simulated.
The simulator could even break down and resume without us noticing. It also doesnt’t have to be fast enough to simulate a second per second. Imagine a simulator actually running for (more) billions of years. It seems silly but possible.
Yes, time isn’t a limiting factor, but error free, coherent processing is.
It could get so long that it becomes impossible for that much information to be processed without a certain number of errors and then the simulation would start breaking down.
The bigger it is, the more information it has and the longer it takes for the next quanta of time in-simulation, the most the risk of error increases.