• flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    That’ll do it. The work might be impressive, but why care about a project that has one purely spite-driven goal that makes no technical or social sense?

    It uses real init systems

    What a completely childish tagline. Even if there was any merit to all the systemd hate, calling it “not a real init system” is absurd.

    They stopped supporting GNOME based desktops and treat that in the most “sour grapes” way imaginable …

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve seen systemd developers themselves say it’s not an init system [it’s more].

      And it’s more a matter of love, than “spite”, to support init-freedom.

      GNOME stopped supporting other init systems.