• SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      And your employment history, financial status, known associates, voter record, you get the idea.

  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “You’ll eventually give in” Tells you everything you need to know about the power of large tech companies in the US .

    We have the money and the power to force this technology in to the mainstream. Tech companies know that Congress is way too old, way too corrupt, and way too slow to really do anything about regulating stuff like this in a reasonable time frame. They have no real barriers and the heads of these companies don’t give a shit about the user as long as they pay their monthly subscription.

  • redwattlebird@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    So creeps like Zuck can upload their LLM conscience into my brain? No thank you.

    … Actually, that would make a great horror movie.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, I resisted mobile phones until about 1999, and didn’t get a “smartphone” until 2014. I was quite the Luddite.

      • SaneMartigan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        I still don’t play mobile games. I thought it was going to be a great opportunity but all the games sucked and I didn’t like the interface.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      No need, at least not for several decades. The tech described in the article is millions of times more capable than current working experimental systems. Possible future? yes. Possible within 100 years? maybe. Kind of on the order of a self-sufficient expanding Mars colony of human settlers.

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I will never ever… hahaha okay you rascal, ya got me! Now get over here and stick that junk in my head-meat haha

  • Archr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Can’t wait for adverts for the ass blaster 9000® to be beamed directly into my frontal lobe without my consent.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Another tech headline, another thing that would have sounded pretty cool 20-30 years ago but today sounds like an absolute nightmare to stay FAR away from. And this one more than most!

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only way I would ever even consider this is if the firmware was open source and the software to interact with it was open source and it had no direct connection to any sort of network at all and required an external device that I could turn off or on to connect to it an external network. Oh, and the hardware would need to be open source as well.

  • Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wouldn’t trust these assholes with a rabid viper let alone my own brain

  • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been evangelising for smart glasses for years. But even if they get the functionality I’ve been hoping for I’m still not going to get them, because i don’t want every woman i meet to think I’m secretly recording her tits

    There’s no way I’m letting Elon musk do brain surgery on me to harvest my thoughts

    • raldone01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      What functionality are you looking for? Most I can think of is gimmicky at best.

      Would be interested even in gimmicky use cases.

      • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Oh, plenty of what i want is gimmicky. GIVE ME A HUD!

        But i can think of things like overlaying arrows on the environment when getting walking directions, setting reminders by seeing things/people, being able to fully view 3d objects when doing things like identifying something (say a flower you’ve seen) by image

        • raldone01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah this usual stuff would be nice but the trade off with privacy and surveillance is not worth the risk IMO. :(

          I want a health bar.

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      People forget about the other genders when it comes to the issues with smart glasses. And kids. Where is the “for the safety of our children” mob, when we need one?

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Where is the “for the safety of our children” mob, when we need one?

        Busy being weaponized against minorities again