• termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    The good thing about stack overflow, (when your question isn’t marked as a duplicate of something completely unrelated), is that you accidentally learn random other things while browsing answers.

    • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Stack overflow is great for learning from posts that are marked as duplicate! I’ve learned the most from those lol

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I asked ChatGPT if it would ever maliciously give me a wrong answer and it said no, so I believe it.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    One of the guys I worked with said be prefers the chatbot because stack overflow always made him feel stupid when he’d ask for help. The emotional dimension is big for some people.

    • theolodis@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I never understood that… I’ve found thousands of answers on SO, asked 3 questions I didn’t find an answer to, and answered maybe 50 questions myself.

      Most of the time people are just too lazy to search for themselves, or unable to abstract a problem.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    2 days ago

    ChatGPT business model: rephrasing stackoverflow answers to make the asker feel like a valuable human being.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Stack Overflow was the antithesis of “Just say something wrong on the internet so that someone will correct you with the real answer” because none of the negative threads actually answered the question lol.

    • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s how some technical people are generally. It always kept me from spending time in tech spaces even though I was always interested. It’s no excuse to be autistic because plenty of autistic people don’t rip your head off for not understanding concepts.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nor care to have those reasons in the first place.

      And if you press them, you get complete bullshit reasons. But SO will also ban you, while ChatGPT only cares about you paying.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s a fun thought but StackOverflow are early adopters for AI so they’re probably not much different at all.

  • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you guessed this sound (rubber duck squeak) is not like the others then you’re absolutely right!

    Source: Sesame Street record from when I was a kid.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sometimes I rubber duck with ChatGPT.

      Honestly I’ve learned more in a few months of fixing its mistakes than I had in years of being on the job.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ime Google AI is much worse about making up wrong answers to sound right.

    If I’d ask ChatGPT and Google AI to help me craft a set of Ansible tasks to do something rather simple but also something I don’t do very often, like converting PEM certs + key to PKCS12…they’d both write a playbook that’s close, but ChatGPT would be much closer.

    But they both say crazy shit sometimes. The other day ChatGPT told me Fedora 40 is the latest release and 43 is still in testing.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honey, we all know they’re hitting the ceiling they predicted in their OpenAI paper on AI Scaling Laws in 2020 and corrected by Deepmind’s 2022 followup paper. It’s trash now and it will always be trash, attempting to give it that infinite power and compute time to reach 94% is just an exercise in futility.