That’ll do it. The work might be impressive, but why care about a project that has one purely spite-driven goal that makes no technical or social sense?
It uses real init systems
What a completely childish tagline. Even if there was any merit to all the systemd hate, calling it “not a real init system” is absurd.
They stopped supporting GNOME based desktops and treat that in the most “sour grapes” way imaginable …
Because it’s Arch, except no
systemd, I guess.That’ll do it. The work might be impressive, but why care about a project that has one purely spite-driven goal that makes no technical or social sense?
What a completely childish tagline. Even if there was any merit to all the systemd hate, calling it “not a real init system” is absurd.
They stopped supporting GNOME based desktops and treat that in the most “sour grapes” way imaginable …
I’ve seen systemd developers themselves say it’s not an init system [it’s more].
And it’s more a matter of love, than “spite”, to support init-freedom.
GNOME stopped supporting other init systems.