“I think what a CEO does is maybe one of the easier things maybe for an AI to do one day,” he said. Although he didn’t talk specifically about CEO functions that an AI could do better, Pichai noted the tech will eliminate some jobs but also “evolve and transition” others—ramifications that mean “people will need to adapt.”

Pichai’s comments come as other tech CEOs have also predicted the coming of a new era of chief executive automations. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman previously said AI will someday do his job better than him, adding, “I will be nothing but enthusiastic the day that happens.” Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of buy-now-pay-later firm Klarna, also said in a post on X earlier this year that “AI is capable of doing all our jobs, my own included.”

  • somtwo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So I’ve already commented on this post, but I’ve had another thought: imagine if your CEO sent you an email saying “we need to do X”. You respond with “no, X causes this issue, we need to do Y” and your CEO responds with “You’re absolutely right! Here’s how we will implement this new policy”

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If that happens I HOPE we can Use our TAX DOLLARS to make Sure CEOS can Continue their Extravagant Lifestyle!

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They are both psychopaths, you’d be hard pressed to find a difference.

      They both see workers as a numbers and expendable.

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’d say you want a human CEO so there’s accountability, but I don’t know that’s even true anymore.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        We as a civilization have 500,000 years of experience dealing with human leaders like that and absolutely no experience dealing with machine leaders like that. Too many variables. Fuck every part of this.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Let’s run the job requirements list:

    • amoral
    • talks a lot about things they don’t understand
    • comfortable with lying if it benefits their goals
    • emotionless psychpathic traits
    • uses enormous amount of resources for questinable gains
    • good at manipulation
    • bad at maths
    • occasional racist outbursts on social media

    Yeah all seems to check out. Replace the CEOs, AI can’t do worse.

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    So… that means they’ll all step down and stop getting paid millions per year, right?

    Right?

    Guys? Right?

    No?

    😐

  • falseWhite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    AI is advancing so swiftly, he said, that over the next 12 months the tech will be able to perform “complex” tasks and act as an agent on a users’ behalf.

    I must be having the same deja vu for a hundredth time. What a clown.

  • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It’s maybe the only job it should actually replace.

    I still wouldn’t trust the current models with it. But tbh even the current models couldn’t be any worse than the current humans in the roles.

  • neuromorph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    "Aw, sh*t. Half the country works for Brawndo. Not anymore! The stock has dropped to zero…

    and the computer did that auto-layoff thing to everybody."

  • somtwo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The job of a tech CEO:

    • Chase trends
    • Mass layoffs in time to make the quarterly reports look better
    • FOMO
    • ???
    • Profit!
  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You don’t even need AI. Just pay staff less and charge customers more, and give the stolen money to shareholders. Ta-da! That’s the CEO’s job done.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because upper management is less checked, they make a lot of human choices, such as keeping a lot of bullshit job positions open as garden hermits (there for scenery, to look busy).

      AI tasked with actually increasing profits may run the business better than their human counterparts.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hype up vaporware. Be unprofitable but keep on hyping to draw in investors and inflate stocks and give yourself an inflated salary and sell off stocks periodically.

      If get lucky enough vaporware eventually becomes a viable company or it goes bankrupt but its fine you already cashed out along the way. Yay.

  • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would love to see a study where they ask a 2024 AI for business decisions around things that happened in 2025. How much you want to bet it already can?