• flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        That’ll do it. The work might be impressive, but why care about a project that has one purely spite-driven goal that makes no technical or social sense?

        It uses real init systems

        What a completely childish tagline. Even if there was any merit to all the systemd hate, calling it “not a real init system” is absurd.

        They stopped supporting GNOME based desktops and treat that in the most “sour grapes” way imaginable …

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve seen systemd developers themselves say it’s not an init system [it’s more].

          And it’s more a matter of love, than “spite”, to support init-freedom.

          GNOME stopped supporting other init systems.