• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We are going to move away from Google, by basing our new future on AOSP, which is also primary maintained by Google…I smell another FireOS level product on the horizon. Still Android, but worse.

    • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That sounds nice and all but linux still is subject to exploits and the open sourced nature of it makes it an enticing target for state actors to include extremely well made obfuscated exploits. I dont know how to win here, tbh.

  • haych@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So that title is just a straight up lie. They want to use a de-googled Android.

    To be honest I was hoping for an alternative OS, competition is always good. But a de-googled Android could possibly be good, but being Chinese I assume instead of Google telemetry you’ll just be replacing it with CCP telemetry.

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Honestly, I think a person in either nation should consider using the opposing nation’s stuff. Harder for the US to backdoor Chinese encryption, or for Chinese to backdoor into an American phone. Play the bastards off each other.

      Odds are, that the Trump Regime will use American apps and phones to identify and track targets for ICE traffickers. China probably does the same to Uighurs. The less attack surfaces they have, the better for their respective peoples.

      • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That sounds funny, but In that reality, the government with all its power will find a way in (they probably already have programs (as in departments) for finding their way into other countries tech).

        Better to just install a proper de-googled android build (grapheneos, etc) and only use wifi (if data/phone num not needed) for the best odds.

        In a couple of years (with more r&d, development and investment) I bet this will change to being use a linux phone.

      • piyuv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Apple building backdoors for CCP and sharing any and all data with them: am I a joke to you?

    • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      US telemetry == CCP telemetry, I can’t see how CCP will be more damaging to regular person.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I think it’s just that they were saying his won’t end up benefitting us. It’s just changing who is holding the binoculars.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Because, at least for now, the US has the greater power to fuck up our lives with the information gathered.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Gurl let me spill the tea, there’s word floating round in China that some bde powa playas be considering maybe kinda putting something together.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Pretty soon they’re going to pencil in a meeting about possibly arranging a committee to discuss preliminary plans to do a feasibility study.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    How easy is it to degoogle Android? Don’t currently use Android or iOS but dumb phone options are getting pretty limited these days.

    If I got an Android phone I would probably be looking at something second hand because fuck paying 3 figures on a phone. I know I wouldn’t use data at all, call/SMS SIM only. I guess another option is not needing to degoogle it as it will never talk to google once I have finished downloading maps of the country for OSMand and a few other apps. Then it can be on Wi-Fi to allow communication with my PC over LAN but don’t allow it access to the internet.

    If it never touches the internet after setup I guess outdated OS doesn’t matter too much.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      If you’re looking at getting a new (used) phone, I would suggest GrapheneOS (the most secure/private de-googled rom afaik).

      You need a Pixel phone, the newer you get the longer you will keep getting software updates for the future (if you keep the phone past these many years of support, then I believe switching to a other rom will be required for security patches etc. Each phone is supported until Google stops supporting them I believe). You said you don’t care about updates because you can keep it from connecting to the internet, but it’s a plus anyways.

      If you plan on never touching a google service, GrapheneOS allows for that (nothing google by default), but on the other hand, if you need google play, etc for banking apps or whatnot, they have that covered with Sandboxed Google Services (which you can run solely in another user profile on your phone for added privacy).

      Anyways, I think GrapheneOS in a great option & their website has much more info if you’d like to continue hearing about it:

      https://grapheneos.org/

      p.s. you can check their website for how long different pixels will have continued support before (if) you get one (incase anyone else is reading this).

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      You have to be careful to get a phone and model supported by one of the projects. Check all compatibility and install instructions before buying a phone. And if you need a manufacturer supplied unlock code, make sure the manufacturer still gives them out . Some will discontinue that service after a few years.

      For graphene os you need one of the gogle devices - i’ve never tried it but i think its the one most people like.

      lineageos supports more devices usually older.

      I recently got lineageos working on sony experia xa2 - very happy with it. But to get there i had to go try like 6 computers before one of them sucessfully sent the bootloader unlock code over the ADB. For some reason usb is temperamental when doing stuff like that

      It is a lot easier on really old stuff like samsung galaxy s3 or s4 if you can tolerate something that old. Maybe you’ll lso end upon an old version of lineage.

      Once you get the bootloader unlocked it is generally straightforward. but modern phones make that fist part awkward.

      • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The only issue with projects like LineageOS is that the camera usually sucks because the full fat camera driver isn’t released to the public, it’s only the basic driver. The camera can still take photos but all of the features you’ve become accustomed to are not there. This was my experience and what the LineageOS team said during the Samsung S5-S8 days.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It depends on your definition of ‘deGoogle’. You can disable the Google apps on most Android phones. They’ll take up storage space, but won’t run.

      If you’re getting a second-hand phone and want to completely deGoogle it, you can check if (1) the bootloader is unlockable and (2) custom ROMs are available online (e.g. Lineage OS compatible devices). In general, Xiaomi, Motorola and Pixel devices have unlockable bootloaders, but not all their models have custom ROMs.

    • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If you have a phone with custom ROM support, pretty easy. I’ve been running LineageOS without GAPPS for like 5 years now. Most stuff just works, but to be fair, I am not using any of the cool kids apps like google pay or android auto.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah guess I don’t really care for most of it. Can get anything I want as an apk or mostly just on fdroid. VLC and an SSH client would be nice.

      • xeekei@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I just got my Pixel 9a and put GrapheneOS on it. The only thing that seems to not work right now is KDE Connect, but I’m unsure if it might be me doing something wrong rather than being impossible.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    357
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Before anyone gets too excited, the headline is clickbait. The bigger Chinese phone brands are looking into de-googled Android. They are still going to use Android.

    several prominent Chinese smartphone manufacturers, including Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, and OnePlus, are exploring the possibility of developing versions of the Android operating system that do not rely on Google Mobile Services.

    Chinese laptop makers are also in search of an OS that isn’t Windows. Queue a race to prop Linux with Android support on that side of things.

  • Lembot_0002@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    We need phones with standard Linux. Without strange “Java only mediator” or something. Just a normal OS.

    Android is a pain in the ass.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      We need phones with standard Linux.

      Already exists. Several iterations are active and work as a daily driver: phone, sms and mobile networking works reliably, apps exist. Just not as many as on Android, and some features are not part of the OS. This is enough for many to declare them “a failure”. That and limited hardware support.

      Google has coddled us for way too long, and at what price.

    • redlemace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Exact! And please no bloatware!!

      Oh wait, before anything else : NO, and I really mean NO AI and/or VR shit. Just none. None A T A L L

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t believe that they’re likely to do GNU/Linux. I bet that they’re going to do a fork of Android off AOSP or something like that.

      Android’s had a huge amount of work put into it to make it suitable to be a consumer mobile phone OS, and the companies here aren’t doing this because they want stuff that GNU/Linux does, but rather because they’re Chinese companies worried about a US-China industrial decoupling and its risks for them. Like, they were okay with the technical status; what changed was that they started to worry about having the rug pulled out from them.

      That being said, I can at least imagine that helping GNU/Linux phone adoption. So, think about what happened with video games. There were some major platforms out there – MacOS, iOS, Windows, various consoles, Android, GNU/Linux. That fragmented the market. Trying to port software to all platforms became a huge pain. What a lot of game developers did was to target a more-or-less platform-agnostic engine and let the engine handle the platform abstraction.

      If the mobile OS space fragments further – like, Android splits into “Google Android” and “China Android” — my guess is that that’ll help drive demand for platform-agnostic engines to help improve portability, and porting one engine to GNU/Linux is a lot easier than every individual program.

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          No. I have a second phone with it just to play with.

          It’s functional, but rough. App support is lacking, VoLTE doesn’t work still which means on countries like the US which shutdown 2/3G you cannot make or receive calls. The UI is clunky and dated.

          I think a lot of these issues would go away pretty quick if it got a lot of attention. But then it’s unlikely to get much attention without that stuff. Vicious cycle. It’s a good base to build on.

          • Num10ck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            thanks for the insight. if you use google voice app on it would that work as a replacement for VoLTE?

            • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              There isn’t a Google Voice app. It’s not Android.

              You could probably place calls from the browser but not receive them.

              I heard of some people setting up IP phone stuff for it, but it doesn’t seem simple.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Seems pretty polished, but I genuinely don’t know. None of my devices support it, so I haven’t had the opportunity to test drive it.

          At some point, “normies” are just going to have to break down and learn something.

          • lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I think postmarketOS will probably win out on market share for Linux phones, mostly because it can use regular flatpak apps, you don’t have to develop special apps, which i thought you had to do for Ubuntu touch (which I guess is now called ubports). Not sure, someone correct me if I’m wrong about the specially built apps part.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would love to have a phone that I could just plug into a USB C dock and use as a normal computer. They’ve got plenty of processing power for that now. Every single program I use except for games could run on a phone if it used normal GNU/Linux.

        • philpo@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Was about to say that - while it’s sadly proprietary and most FOSS Apps are not well supported, it is a nice showcase. But I don’t think it’s actually used much by people.

          Which is kind of sad.

    • lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I was given an old Chromebook tablet by a friend that wanted to get rid of it, and it just happened to have mainline Linux support. I was able to get postmarketOS running on it, and got gnome shell mobile as the DE. It works, and works well. The apps that support the touch interface and are made to be responsive, etc work really well, and the waydroid integegration works fantastically well. I was able to get android version of jellyfin working, with vlc, and a few other apps I use daily. All this in 4GB of ram, I’m really impressed! This screenshot was running gnome shell I think, I’ve since switch to the ‘mobile’ variant of it, and running system monitor with android vlc and android jellyfin running, zoomed out so you could see all the apps running at once.

      1000011835

      Its time for a Linux phone, I put in an order for the 2nd batch of this phone, hopefully they start shipping soon, they supposedly already shipped the first batch to users.

      https://furilabs.com/shop/flx1/

        • lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Good catch, while I guess they’re not using postmarketOS, that’s what was supported on the device i had, and what enabled me to test out the mobile version to gnome shell, and try out the phone app ecosystem. It seems like its ready for prime time, especially since waydroid performs so well, android apps can fill the void for any missing native Linux apps.

      • Chris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        They have been promising a good Linux phone for forever. Is this one any good? Will support last?

        • lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          No idea as i haven’t gotten mine yet. They’re still filling the next pre-order batch of production, but from the reviews on their website, it seems as responsive as you’d expect from android, which was a huge problem with Dev phones like the pinephone, they were way too sluggish with terrible battery life.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly, I think the old FirefoxOS could do well these days. Literally everything an app can do can be done by a browser with a decent caching/local storage scheme. Slap a decent camera on that and it would be amazing.

      • hazypenguin@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you can implement an equivalent to Apple’s Secure Enclave on a device running that, I’ll be interested. I haven’t seen even a device running Android doing that yet though.

    • hazypenguin@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Let me know when there’s a phone with Linux that has a security implementation that matches Apple’s Secure Enclave.

  • Libra00@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You probably should’ve led with the fact that this is Chinese phones, not like Samsung and shit.

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It makes sense for Chinese smartphone OEMs to move away from the Google version of Android. In the medium to long term you are setting up yourself for failure if you are reliant on an American company.

    Unfortunately, the United States cannot be trusted.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Sure, but with China everyone more less knew this. The US has used up the last benefit of the doubt that they had in the past 5 months.

      • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s not like China can be trusted either

        What exactly are you talking about? China has at no point in my lifetime exerted economic violence or taken violent policy turns towards harming other economies. They’ve been a reliable trading partner since they opened up to trade in the Deng Xiaoping/Nixon years, and done absolutely nothing remotely comparable to the US tariffs of recent (or economic embargoes to “enemy” countries like Venezuela).

        • pycorax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic here. I hope you are. If not a quick search on Wikipedia would show China’s aggressive behaviour towards its neighbouring countries.